Norwegian Wood Review

Norwegian Wood Review 2025: Why Murakami’s Novel is Both Beautiful and Devastating

Norwegian Wood (ノルウェイの森, Noruwei no Mori) is a 1987 literary fiction and romance novel by Haruki Murakami, originally published in Japan by Kodansha. The first English translation was by Alfred Birnbaum in 1989, followed by Jay Rubin’s 2000 translation, which remains the definitive edition for international readers.

The title comes from the Beatles song Norwegian Wood (This Bird Has Flown)—a favourite of Naoko, one of the book’s central characters.

When Haruki Murakami published Norwegian Wood, he could not have anticipated how profoundly this novel would shape his literary reputation in Japan and abroad.

First translated into English in 1989 by Alfred Birnbaum (for Japanese learners of English) and later in 2000 by Jay Rubin for a global audience, the book remains one of the most discussed and emotionally resonant works in contemporary Japanese literature.

Categorized as literary fiction and romance, Norwegian Wood is not simply a love story. It is an intricate narrative of memory, longing, youth, and the inexorable presence of death.

Set against the turbulence of late-1960s Tokyo, Murakami uses the Beatles’ song “Norwegian Wood (This Bird Has Flown)” not merely as a title but as a leitmotif that ties together nostalgia, music, and the ache of remembering.

At its core, Norwegian Wood is an intimate confession of how love and loss coexist, how memory both preserves and distorts the past, and how coming of age in an uncertain era forces choices between living fully and being swallowed by grief.

1. Background

Murakami has often described how Norwegian Wood emerged from an earlier short story, Firefly, which later became part of his collection Blind Willow, Sleeping Woman. Written during a time when student protests and anti-establishment movements were sweeping Japan, the book captures a cultural moment while avoiding overt political alignment.

The student unrest, as seen through protagonist Toru Watanabe’s eyes, comes across as “weak-willed and hypocritical,” providing a muted political backdrop to the more urgent private struggles of the characters.

Upon its release, Norwegian Wood made Murakami a household name in Japan, though he has admitted to feeling uncomfortable with the celebrity it brought. The Japanese youth of the 1980s embraced the novel as a mirror to their own disillusionment, and the book has since been translated into over 30 languages, selling millions of copies worldwide.

2. Norwegian Wood Plot

Plot Overview

The story opens with thirty-seven-year-old Toru Watanabe landing in Hamburg, Germany, when an orchestral cover of the Beatles’ Norwegian Wood plays on the airplane. The melody triggers an overwhelming rush of memory—autumn 1969, when Toru was a university student in Tokyo and deeply entangled in a web of love, death, and emotional turbulence.

Toru’s closest friend in high school, Kizuki, had been dating Naoko since their childhood. Their bond felt unbreakable until Kizuki unexpectedly took his own life on his seventeenth birthday. For Naoko, the loss carved an irreparable void.

For Toru, it planted a quiet obsession with mortality: “I was thinking about myself. I was thinking about the beautiful girl walking next to me. And worse, I was in love. Love with complications”.

A year later, Toru and Naoko reconnect in Tokyo. Their long Sunday walks become a silent ritual, culminating on Naoko’s 20th birthday when they have sex—Toru’s realization that she is a virgin making the moment heavier than he anticipated. Soon after, Naoko withdraws from university, entering a secluded psychiatric sanatorium in the mountains near Kyoto.

While Naoko retreats into her fragile inner world, Toru meets Midori Kobayashi, a vivacious classmate whose personality is the antithesis of Naoko’s. Midori is lively, irreverent, and unafraid to confront Toru about his feelings. Torn between loyalty to Naoko and the possibility of new life with Midori, Toru inhabits an emotional no-man’s land.

In visits to the sanatorium, Toru also meets Reiko Ishida, Naoko’s older roommate and confidante—a gifted pianist whose mental health struggles and failed marriage mirror some of Naoko’s wounds. Reiko offers Toru frank, sometimes unsettling, advice about love and survival.

When Naoko eventually takes her own life, Toru drifts into a month-long period of aimless travel. The grief is suffocating. But in an understated moment of clarity, Reiko visits him in Tokyo, and together they hold a private memorial for Naoko on the rooftop.

That night, they sleep together—not as lovers, but as two lonely people trying to make sense of their survival. In the aftermath, Toru calls Midori, telling her: “I love you.” The novel closes with Midori’s haunting question: “Where are you now?”—a query as much about emotional presence as about geography.

Setting

The primary setting—late-1960s Tokyo—carries a dual atmosphere: on one side, the political unrest of student protests; on the other, the quieter yet more devastating emotional revolutions in private lives.

Murakami’s Tokyo is not bustling with neon chaos but filled with dormitories smelling of sweat and cigarette smoke, quiet bars, bookstores, and anonymous streets where long walks become emotional lifelines.

The mountain sanatorium near Kyoto serves as a counterpoint: an isolated world where time stretches and internal landscapes dominate. The contrast between urban restlessness and rural stillness reflects Toru’s internal conflict—whether to engage with the world or retreat from it.

3. Analysis

3.1 Characters

Toru Watanabe

The narrator and emotional axis of Norwegian Wood, Toru is a drama major with no strong vocational calling, a young man adrift in a city and era brimming with unrest. His defining traits are his introspection, loyalty, and a near-obsessive need to make sense of loss.

Toru’s tone throughout is understated but deeply reflective: “Clutching these faded, fading, imperfect memories to my breast, I go on writing this book with all the desperate intensity of a starving man sucking on bones”. This confession gives the reader both a reason for the narrative and an intimate glimpse into his psychology.

Toru’s moral challenge lies in navigating his relationships with Naoko and Midori—two women embodying opposite responses to life’s fragility. His growth is less about resolution than about learning to inhabit uncertainty.

Naoko

Naoko is beautiful, enigmatic, and emotionally fragile. Haunted by the suicides of both her older sister and Kizuki, she lives in a state where joy is fleeting and trust in stability is almost impossible.

Her conversation about the “field well” is one of the novel’s most haunting metaphors: a hidden, deadly depth in the earth that no one can locate, symbolizing the unseen dangers within the mind. Her belief that she can only feel safe when close to Toru underscores both her vulnerability and her dependence.

Naoko’s decline at the sanatorium is rendered without melodrama, but her eventual suicide crystallizes the novel’s meditation on memory and impermanence.

Midori Kobayashi

If Naoko represents stillness and fragility, Midori embodies energy, desire, and blunt honesty. She runs a small bookstore with her sister after her mother’s death, and she isn’t afraid to challenge Toru’s emotional passivity. Her frankness—about love, sex, and death—offers a counterpoint to Naoko’s quiet despair. Through Midori, Murakami shows the possibility of embracing life without denying its inevitable losses.

Reiko Ishida

A gifted pianist whose career and marriage were destroyed by mental illness, Reiko becomes both mentor and mirror to Naoko. She dispenses hard-won wisdom to Toru, often in uncomfortably direct terms. Her rooftop memorial with Toru after Naoko’s death is both a farewell and a passing of emotional responsibility.

Supporting Figures

  • Kizuki: The magnetic friend whose suicide sets the novel in motion. His absence is a constant presence.
  • Nagasawa: A charismatic, morally ambivalent university student whose selfishness contrasts sharply with Toru’s moral struggles.
  • Hatsumi: Nagasawa’s girlfriend, whose tragic suicide years later reminds us that grief ripples far beyond immediate circles.

3.2 Writing Style and Structure

Murakami employs a first-person retrospective narrative, allowing the reader to experience both the immediacy of youth and the filtering lens of maturity. The prose alternates between concrete sensory detail—“The October breeze set white fronds of head-tall grasses swaying”—and philosophical reflection, often without clear transition, mimicking the way memory surfaces.

The novel’s structure is cyclical rather than linear, beginning and ending with Toru’s disorientation. Conversations often meander, serving less to advance plot than to deepen character and atmosphere. The Beatles’ Norwegian Wood functions as a recurring auditory trigger, linking past and present.

Murakami’s style also mixes Japanese minimalism with Western narrative techniques. The pacing is deliberate, encouraging the reader to inhabit the silences between words—a style that some find hypnotic and others frustrating.

3.3 Themes and Symbolism

Memory and Nostalgia

The very act of telling the story is Toru’s attempt to preserve memory against the erosion of time. Yet he acknowledges the inevitable fading: “The sad truth is that what I could recall in five seconds all too soon needed ten… someday… the shadows will be swallowed up in darkness”.

Death and the Fragility of Life

Suicide recurs not as plot shock but as existential reality. Kizuki, Naoko, and Hatsumi’s deaths frame the narrative, forcing the living to redefine meaning.

Isolation and Connection

Characters drift between moments of intense intimacy and prolonged emotional isolation. Even in physical closeness, as with Naoko’s walks with Toru, there is a pervasive sense of distance.

The “Field Well” as Symbol

Naoko’s imagined deep well becomes a metaphor for hidden, lethal psychological depths—places one can fall into “and that’d be the end of you”. It encapsulates the novel’s view of mental illness as both invisible and profoundly dangerous.

Music as Emotional Anchor

The Beatles’ song is not just background—it is a mnemonic device for Toru’s most formative years, proof that certain art can forever link us to specific emotional landscapes.

3.4 Genre-Specific Elements

As a work of literary fiction, Norwegian Wood prioritizes psychological depth over plot twists. Its realism is grounded in the specific social and political climate of 1960s Japan but remains accessible to a global audience.

Dialogue quality varies by character: Naoko’s speech is hesitant, often circling around what she means; Midori’s is sharp and unfiltered. This deliberate contrast deepens the reader’s understanding of Toru’s emotional crossroad.

Recommended for: Readers who appreciate introspective narratives, those interested in Japanese postwar culture, and anyone drawn to themes of love, loss, and the bittersweet weight of remembering.

4. Evaluation

Strengths

1. Emotional Authenticity

Murakami’s handling of grief is neither sentimental nor clinical—it feels lived-in. The scene where Toru recalls Naoko’s voice “slowing down to find the exact word” is a perfect example of how small gestures carry enormous emotional weight.

2. Complex Female Characters

Naoko, Midori, and Reiko are distinct in personality, worldview, and influence on Toru. They avoid being reduced to plot devices; instead, they are agents of their own choices, even when those choices lead to tragedy.

3. Sensory Detail and Atmosphere

From “white fronds of head-tall grasses swaying” to the “smell of the grass, the faint chill of the wind”, Murakami uses sensory immersion to anchor memory in tangible detail.

4. Universal Themes in a Specific Context

Though steeped in the politics and culture of 1960s Japan, Norwegian Wood speaks to anyone who has navigated young adulthood in the shadow of loss.

Weaknesses

  1. Pacing for Impatient Readers
    The novel’s meandering pace and introspective focus can frustrate those expecting a tightly driven plot.
  2. Ambiguity of Ending
    Some readers find the final “Where are you now?” unsatisfying—wanting explicit resolution between Toru and Midori.
  3. Sparse Political Engagement
    While set against a backdrop of student unrest, the book deliberately avoids deep political discourse, which some might see as a missed opportunity.

Impact

For many Japanese readers in the late 1980s, Norwegian Wood articulated the private dimensions of a generation’s uncertainty—something political slogans could not. Internationally, it cemented Murakami’s reputation as a global literary voice capable of blending East and West, intimacy and detachment.

Comparison with Similar Works

  • “The Bell Jar” by Sylvia Plath — Both center on a young narrator navigating mental illness (their own or others’) in a society that doesn’t fully understand it.
  • “A Moveable Feast” by Ernest Hemingway — Shares the nostalgic yet unromanticized reflection on youth.
  • “On the Road” by Jack Kerouac — While Kerouac’s work is more kinetic, both novels convey the restlessness of youth searching for meaning.

Reception and Criticism

Critics largely praised Norwegian Wood for its emotional depth and minimalist prose. The Complete Review summarized consensus as “Almost (but not quite) all are very enthusiastic”. Some Japanese critics, however, worried about the novel’s frank depiction of sexuality for a youth audience.

Adaptation

Tran Anh Hung’s 2010 film adaptation stars Kenichi Matsuyama (Toru), Rinko Kikuchi (Naoko), and Kiko Mizuhara (Midori).

With a score by Jonny Greenwood, the film captures the visual and atmospheric tone of the novel but, inevitably, compresses character arcs—especially Reiko’s. While visually stunning, the adaptation divides fans: some praise its faithfulness to mood, others lament its lack of narrative clarity.

5. Personal Insight & Contemporary Educational Relevance

Reading Norwegian Wood today resonates in the context of rising youth mental-health awareness. Naoko’s “field well” metaphor eerily parallels modern discussions about unseen psychological struggles—reminding us that depression can be both invisible and fatal if unaddressed.

Contemporary statistics mirror the urgency Murakami subtly underscores.

According to WHO data, suicide remains the fourth leading cause of death among 15–29-year-olds worldwide (2023). In Japan, while rates have declined since the 1990s, young women’s suicide rates have risen in recent years. In this light, Naoko’s story transcends fiction: it’s an educational prompt for schools, universities, and communities to invest in early mental-health intervention.

From a literary-education perspective, Norwegian Wood also models how setting, music, and personal memory can be intertwined to enrich narrative structure—making it a valuable case study for creative writing students.

6. Norwegian Wood Quotes

  • “Clutching these faded, fading, imperfect memories to my breast, I go on writing this book with all the desperate intensity of a starving man sucking on bones.”
  • “The smell of the grass, the faint chill of the wind… I feel as if I can reach out and trace them with a fingertip.”
  • “A deep well, but nobody knows where it is. You could fall in and that’d be the end of you.”
  • “When I’m really close to you like this, I’m not the least bit scared. Nothing dark or evil could ever tempt me.”
  • “Where are you now?”

7. Conclusion

Norwegian Wood is less a story about love than about survival—how we carry the memory of those we’ve lost while continuing to choose life. Murakami’s restraint makes the grief more palpable; his refusal to offer easy resolutions mirrors the reality of emotional recovery.

For readers drawn to introspective narratives, Japanese postwar culture, and character-driven storytelling, this novel remains essential. Its lessons—about presence, loss, and the fragility of human connection—are as relevant in the digital age as they were in the analog 1960s.

Scroll to Top