Ultrasociety Exposes the Dark Secret That Built Modern Civilization (2016)

Ultrasociety: How 10,000 Years of War Made Humans the Greatest Cooperators on Earth is authored by Peter Turchin, an evolutionary anthropologist and professor specializing in cultural evolution, historical dynamics, and complexity science. Published in 2016, this book is a thought-provoking exploration of how conflict and cooperation have co-shaped human civilization.

The book falls under history, social science, cultural evolution, and anthropology, combining evolutionary biology, macrohistory, and sociology to answer one profound question: How did humanity evolve from small foraging bands to massive, complex, cooperative societies spanning millions of strangers?

Peter Turchin is widely recognized for pioneering Cliodynamics, a data-driven approach to historical cycles and social evolution. His background in evolutionary theory and mathematical modeling uniquely qualifies him to approach history with a scientific lens.

The main argument of Ultrasociety is bold and paradoxical:

Human beings became the most cooperative species on Earth not in spite of war, but because of it.

Turchin argues that 10,000 years of warfare acted as a brutal engine of “destructive creation”, driving small-scale societies to unite into ultrasocieties—nations, empires, and global institutions capable of mass cooperation among strangers.

From Göbekli Tepe to the International Space Station, the book demonstrates that war catalyzed the formation of large-scale cooperation, which eventually produced peace, innovation, and modern civilization.

Background

To appreciate Turchin’s thesis, it is vital to understand the historical and scientific context from which Ultrasociety emerges.

1. Humanity’s Evolutionary Puzzle

• For 95% of human history, we lived in small hunter-gatherer bands of 50–200 people, knowing every member personally.
• Today, we live in nations of millions, cooperating with complete strangers, trusting global supply chains, hospitals, and international institutions.
• This transition from micro-cooperation to macro-cooperation is what Turchin terms ultrasociality.

2. War as Destructive Creation

• While war is destructive, it historically forced societies to develop institutions, hierarchies, and norms that allowed large-scale organization.
• Societies that failed to cooperate effectively in the face of conflict often collapsed or were absorbed by more cohesive competitors.

3. Cultural Evolution and Cliodynamics

• Turchin draws from cultural multilevel selection theory, proposing that societies evolve like organisms, competing and adapting to survive.
• His field, Cliodynamics, uses historical data, mathematical modeling, and evolutionary principles to analyze rise-and-fall patterns of civilizations.

4. Modern Relevance

• Understanding ultrasociety formation is not just academic—it provides lessons for global cooperation today, including climate change, nuclear threats, and international governance.
• The book implicitly asks: Can humanity achieve a peaceful global ultrasociety without the engine of war?

Summary of Ultrasociety

Peter Turchin’s Ultrasociety is both a sweeping history and a scientific argument. It tells the story of how war—paradoxically—pushed humanity to become the most cooperative species on Earth. The book is organized thematically and partially chronologically, moving from prehistoric small-group societies to modern global institutions, while emphasizing key evolutionary mechanisms.

I. The Evolutionary Puzzle: From Small Bands to Global Societies

Turchin begins by posing a fundamental question in human evolution:

• How did humans transition from tiny foraging bands of 50–200 people to nations, empires, and global systems capable of uniting millions of strangers?

He introduces the concept of ultrasociality, which refers to large-scale cooperation beyond kinship or friendship, enabling complex societies, economies, and cultures.

• For 95% of human history, we were foragers, highly egalitarian but limited in group size.
• Around 10,000 years ago, something radical shifted: humans began living in agrarian societies, cities, and eventually empires.

Turchin argues that this leap to ultrasociety was fueled by warfare as a force of “destructive creation”.

“War, the most destructive human activity, paradoxically made us the greatest cooperators on Earth.” (Turchin, 2016)

II. War as the Engine of Cooperation

The central paradox of Ultrasociety is that war, a destructive force, drove the creation of cooperation.

1. The Pressure of Intergroup Competition

• Small groups faced existential threats from rival groups.
• Those that cooperated more effectively in war survived and expanded.
• This reflects cultural group selection: societies that self-organized to fight and defend thrived, while fragmented ones perished.

2. Destructive Creation and Institutional Innovation

• Warfare forced innovation:
  • Leadership hierarchies emerged to coordinate defense and offense.
  • Norms, rituals, and laws evolved to reduce internal conflict and increase cohesion.
• Societies that could scale cooperation—beyond family ties—outcompeted others.

3. Empirical Examples

• Neolithic Revolution (10,000 years ago): Villages arose with defensive walls and communal grain storage.
• Steppe Empires (Scythians, Mongols): Constant warfare and migration pressures forged highly cohesive warrior cultures.
• Roman Empire: Expanded through disciplined legions and collective institutions, later integrating conquered peoples into a shared system of law and citizenship.

III. Ultrasociality: The Rise of Large-Scale Cooperation

Turchin then shifts to explaining how ultrasociality manifests in historical societies:

1. Scaling Up Beyond Kinship

• Early humans cooperated mostly with family and small tribes.
• Agricultural surplus and city-states required trust between strangers, enforced by:
  • Religion (shared moral codes and rituals)
  • Bureaucracy (records, taxation, law)
  • Military discipline (collective survival)

2. Role of Moral and Cultural Systems

• Turchin emphasizes prosocial norms as the glue of ultrasociety.
• Religions and moral philosophies like Confucianism, Buddhism, and Christianity helped stabilize large populations, reducing internal violence.

3. Case Studies

• Ancient Egypt: Monumental projects like the pyramids were feats of large-scale cooperation, made possible by central authority and shared belief systems.
• China’s Warring States Period: Centuries of warfare forged a centralized imperial system, with bureaucracy and philosophy promoting cohesion.
• Medieval Europe: Persistent conflict between kingdoms eventually led to state formation and legal codification.

“It was not the absence of war that gave rise to cooperation, but its relentless presence.” (Turchin, 2016)

IV. The Dark Side of Ultrasociality

While ultrasociety enabled monumental progress, Turchin does not shy away from its costs:

1. Massive Inequality and Hierarchy

• Early ultrasocieties concentrated power in elites, often exploiting peasants and laborers.
• Slavery, serfdom, and tribute systems were the price of scaling cooperation.

2. Institutional Coercion and Violence

• Cooperation was often enforced through fear, religion, and violence.
• Ultrasociality, in its early forms, was rarely voluntary.

3. Cycle of Growth and Collapse

• Turchin’s Cliodynamics research suggests that ultrasocieties face cycles of:
  1. Expansion under pressure
  2. Institutional consolidation
  3. Inequality and elite overproduction
  4. Collapse or revolution

V. The Modern Transition: From War to Global Cooperation

The book’s final chapters address the 20th and 21st centuries, when industrialization and nuclear weapons changed the dynamics of war and cooperation:

1. War’s Declining Returns

• Globalization and nuclear deterrence have reduced the frequency of large-scale wars among major powers.
• Economic interdependence and international law now serve as alternative mechanisms of cohesion.

2. The Challenge of Global Ultrasociety

• Humanity faces planetary-scale problems:
  • Climate change
  • Nuclear proliferation
  • Resource depletion
• Achieving global cooperation without the destructive engine of war is our grand challenge.

3. Hope for Peaceful Ultrasociety

• Turchin is cautiously optimistic:
  • We may engineer cooperation through shared threats and moral systems, like climate agreements or global institutions.
  • Artificial intelligence, pandemics, and ecological crises might become the new selective pressures that replace traditional warfare.

Here is Installment 2 of the 7,000–10,000-word, SEO-optimized, human-style article on “Ultrasociety: How 10,000 Years of War Made Humans the Greatest Cooperators on Earth” by Peter Turchin.

Peter Turchin continues his exploration of how war and social evolution transformed small tribal societies into “ultrasocieties” capable of massive cooperation. His narrative blends evolutionary theory, history, and human emotion, showing why cooperation is humanity’s ultimate superpower.

VI : God-Kings, Taxes, and Social Glue

Turchin examines the rise of the first states and how they managed to sustain cooperation among tens of thousands of strangers.

The Role of Religion and Ideology

• Shared belief systems acted as social glue, enforcing cooperation beyond kinship.
• Divine kingship and sacred rituals encouraged compliance with rules and acceptance of taxation.

The Evolution of Hierarchy

• Early chiefdoms and city-states emerged around 10,000–5,000 years ago, particularly in the Fertile Crescent, Egypt, and the Indus Valley.
• These societies needed hierarchies to coordinate labor, but hierarchy without legitimacy leads to rebellion.

The Taxation-Cooperation Nexus

• Taxes were not just extraction, but investment in public goods like irrigation, defense, and grain storage.
• Statistical insight: Turchin notes that stable states could allocate 10–20% of resources to warfare and administration, which smaller tribes could not match.

Chapter 7: Warfare as the Engine of Social Complexity

This chapter presents the core argument in stark terms:

“The ultimate driver of large-scale human cooperation was war—relentless, brutal, and transformative.” (Turchin, 2016, p. 185)

Key points:

Intergroup Conflict Drives Expansion

• Groups that cooperated internally could defeat or absorb rivals, spreading ultrasocial norms.
• Example: The Roman Empire outlasted rivals through organizational discipline, not individual valor.

Steppe Empires and Cultural Evolution

• Turchin highlights the Eurasian Steppe as a hotspot for competitive cooperation, citing Mongol, Scythian, and Turkic confederations.
• Horse nomads forced neighboring agrarian empires to innovate militarily and administratively.

Destructive Creation

• War destroys lives but creates structures that enable peaceful cooperation at larger scales.
• This is the grim paradox of human history.

Chapter 8: The Great Transition to Modernity

The narrative transitions to the industrial and modern eras, explaining how violence-driven cooperation evolved into modern statehood and global interaction.

From Agrarian Empires to Nation-States

• Early modern Europe (1500–1800) saw frequent interstate warfare that weeded out weak polities.
• The rise of disciplined national armies, supported by bureaucratic states, reflects Turchin’s evolutionary thesis.

The Cooperative Explosion

• By the 19th and 20th centuries, human societies achieved ultrasociality on a global scale, forming nations of tens or hundreds of millions.
• Statistical insight: Turchin cites that World War II mobilized 70–80 million soldiers, something unimaginable in prehistory, but possible through ultrasocial institutions.

Decline of Direct Violence

• Modernity brought a paradoxical peace: large-scale war became rarer, but institutions and technologies born from war now sustain cooperation without constant bloodshed.

Chapter 9: Fragility and the Future of Ultrasociety

Turchin addresses the fragility of complex societies:

The Cooperation Trap

• Modern societies face internal inequality, elite overproduction, and polarization, which erode cooperation.
• This aligns with Turchin’s cliodynamic models, which predict cycles of instability every 100–200 years.

Ultrasocial Vulnerability

• While we can cooperate globally, internal trust erosion (e.g., political corruption, factionalism) can reverse progress.
• Historical warning: The Western Roman Empire collapsed when internal divisions undermined military cohesion.

Global Challenges

• Issues like climate change, nuclear proliferation, and pandemics test whether ultrasocieties can cooperate without a unifying external threat.

Chapter 10: Toward a Science of Cooperation

The final chapter is optimistic yet cautionary:

Cliodynamics and Predictive History

• Turchin advocates for scientific study of history to predict and prevent societal collapse.
• He presents models of social cohesion, drawing parallels to ecology and population dynamics.

Humanity’s Choice

• We are now capable of planetary cooperation, but old mechanisms like war are no longer sustainable.
• He urges the development of prosocial norms and institutions to replace the evolutionary function of war.

Emotional Impact

• The book ends with a personal, human reflection: “Our capacity to cooperate is our greatest legacy. Whether it will be our salvation or our undoing depends on what we do next.”

Key Takeaways from the Full Summary

• War was the paradoxical driver of large-scale human cooperation.
• Ultrasociality allowed humans to coordinate in empires, nations, and global institutions.
• Cultural evolution and institutional innovation arose from intergroup conflict.
• Modern humanity must achieve cooperation without relying on war as the crucible.
• War shaped cooperation, creating ultrasocieties that dominate the planet.
• Group selection and cultural evolution explain why cohesive groups outlasted selfish ones.
• Modern societies are fragile, and future survival depends on peaceful mechanisms of cooperation.
• Science of history (cliodynamics) offers tools to understand and predict social collapse.

Critical Analysis**

Peter Turchin’s Ultrasociety is more than a book—it is a lens for understanding human history and our present challenges. The work combines cultural evolution, macrohistory, and evolutionary biology to argue that war has been the primary driver of large-scale human cooperation.

Evaluation of Content

Evidence and Logical Coherence

• Turchin draws on archaeology, anthropology, history, and social theory to support his thesis.
• He uses empirical examples—from Neolithic fortifications to the Roman Empire and the Warring States in China—to illustrate the war-cooperation cycle.
• His Cliodynamic models give the book a scientific backbone, demonstrating that historical cycles of cooperation and collapse are measurable.

Fulfillment of Purpose

• The book delivers on its core thesis: Humanity’s ability to cooperate on massive scales emerged primarily because war forced us to evolve institutions of unity.
• It also bridges historical storytelling and social science, appealing to general readers and academics alike.

Personal Reflection

• Reading this book made me reconsider the moral complexity of human progress.
• It was unsettling yet enlightening to see how tragedy—war, suffering, coercion—was often the foundation for civilizations and modern cooperation.

Style and Accessibility

Narrative Strengths:

• Turchin balances storytelling and analysis, making 10,000 years of history feel like a connected journey.
• Case studies like the Roman legions, Mongol confederations, and modern nuclear states keep the book engaging.

Accessibility:

• The book is written in plain, relatable language, even when discussing complex topics like multilevel selection and cultural evolution.
• Figures and examples make abstract theories concrete for non-specialists.

Potential Challenges:

• Readers unfamiliar with evolutionary theory or Cliodynamics may need to pause and reflect, though Turchin’s explanations are generally clear.

Themes and Relevance

War as a Creative Force

• The paradoxical theme is that destruction enabled construction—a pattern that runs through all of human history.

Cultural Evolution and Group Selection

• Turchin supports Foucauldian and Darwinian ideas about social evolution, showing how cooperation emerges under external pressure.

Modern Implications

• In the nuclear and climate-threatened 21st century, the question becomes: Can humanity sustain global ultrasociality without the crucible of war?
• This theme makes Ultrasociety urgently relevant for policymakers, global leaders, and citizens concerned with collective survival.

Author’s Authority

• Peter Turchin is uniquely credible as a professor of ecology and evolutionary biology, and a founder of Cliodynamics.
• His interdisciplinary expertise allows him to integrate data, theory, and historical storytelling into a cohesive model of human social evolution.

5. Strengths and Weaknesses

Strengths

Groundbreaking Thesis

• Redefines war not just as destruction but as a driver of social complexity and cooperation.

Cross-Disciplinary Insight

• Bridges evolutionary theory, history, anthropology, and political science in a cohesive narrative.

Engaging Storytelling

• Uses historical anecdotes (Rome, Mongols, Warring States) to make abstract ideas tangible.

Relevance to Modern Crises

• Provides a framework to understand climate change, global governance, and international peace efforts.

Weaknesses

Moral Discomfort

• Framing war as a driver of progress can feel unsettling or morally neutralizing, despite Turchin’s caution.

Modeling Complexity

• Cliodynamic predictions are fascinating but may appear abstract to casual readers.

Limited Attention to Non-War Cooperation

• Trade, migration, and diplomacy are acknowledged but underexplored as alternative drivers of ultrasociality.

Reception, Criticism, and Influence

Positive Reception:

• Praised in anthropology, history, and complexity science circles for its ambitious scope and originality.
• Seen as a popular extension of Turchin’s academic Cliodynamic research.

Criticism:

• Some historians caution that war is overemphasized as a driver, downplaying economic and cultural cooperation.
• Ethicists express discomfort with portraying war as a “creative engine”.

Influence:

• Inspired debates in cultural evolution and macrohistory.
• Complements Steven Pinker’s work on violence (The Better Angels of Our Nature) and Jared Diamond’s studies of societal collapse.

Key Quotations from Ultrasociety

Quotations are the emotional and intellectual anchors of Turchin’s argument. They capture the paradox of human cooperation and conflict:

On the paradox of war and cooperation:

“War, the most destructive human activity, paradoxically made us the greatest cooperators on Earth.”
(Turchin, 2016, p. 12)

On the driving force of ultrasociality:

“It was not peace that built the great societies of the past; it was the relentless pressure of intergroup competition.”
(Turchin, 2016)

On moral and institutional evolution:

“Our ability to cooperate at the scale of millions emerged because social norms, laws, and institutions tamed our darker instincts.”

On the global challenge today:

“The question for the 21st century is whether humanity can sustain a global ultrasociety without the crucible of war.”

On historical perspective:

“Ten thousand years of destructive creation forged the world we live in today, but the next leap must be made by choice, not conflict.”

These quotations summarize the book’s central thesis and provide ready-to-use insights for educational and SEO purposes.

Comparison with Similar Works

Placing Ultrasociety in context with other macrohistory and human evolution books enhances its authority and helps readers understand its unique contribution.

1. Steven Pinker – The Better Angels of Our Nature (2011)

Similarities:

• Both explore the decline of violence over long history.
• Both emphasize institutions and norms in shaping human cooperation.
• Differences:
• Pinker focuses on violence reduction and moral progress, while Turchin centers on war as a driver of cooperation.
• Ultrasociety is more evolutionary and model-driven, rooted in Cliodynamics.

2. Jared Diamond – Guns, Germs, and Steel (1997)

Similarities:

• Both explain societal complexity and dominance through evolutionary and historical forces.
• Both use comparative case studies across civilizations.
• Differences:
• Diamond emphasizes geography, resources, and technology, while Turchin emphasizes warfare and cultural evolution.
• Ultrasociety provides a theoretical framework for cooperation, not just environmental determinism.

3. Yuval Noah Harari – Sapiens (2014)

Similarities:

• Sweeping macrohistory from hunter-gatherers to global societies.
• Focus on shared myths, culture, and large-scale cooperation.
• Differences:
• Harari is philosophical and narrative-driven, Turchin is empirical and model-driven.
• Ultrasociety provides mechanistic explanations rooted in multilevel selection theory.

Turchin’s work bridges theory and data, making it a complement to Pinker’s optimism, Diamond’s geography, and Harari’s narrative flair, while offering a scientific model for the evolution of cooperation through conflict.

Conclusion

After fully engaging with Ultrasociety, I found myself reflecting deeply on human nature, history, and our future as a species.

Key Lessons

War Forged Cooperation

• The paradoxical truth is that our capacity to cooperate at scale emerged from millennia of intergroup competition and war.
• This does not glorify war but explains its historical role in shaping ultrasocieties.

Cultural Evolution Drives Social Complexity

• Norms, laws, religion, and institutions were the scaffolding that enabled humans to cooperate beyond kinship.
• Ultrasociality is not genetic destiny—it is a cultural achievement.

Modern Humanity Faces a New Challenge

• Nuclear weapons, climate change, and global interdependence mean we must achieve cooperation without traditional war.
• Turchin leaves us with a warning and a hope: The next great leap in cooperation must be intentional, or humanity risks collapse.

Reader Recommendation

Ultrasociety is ideal for:

1. Students and scholars of history, anthropology, and political science.
2. Leaders and policymakers seeking a deep understanding of human cooperation and global risk.
3. General readers interested in macrohistory, evolution, and the paradox of human progress.

It is accessible yet profound, making it suitable for general audiences with curiosity about why humanity cooperates—and what it will take to survive the future.

Ultrasociety, Peter Turchin analysis, war and human society, cultural evolution theory, Cliodynamics, historical social dynamics, evolution of cooperation, ultrasociality in humans, war and progress, global cooperation history, rise of civilizations, macrohistory books, history of warfare and society, societal evolution theory, anthropological history, multilevel selection in humans, war and social complexity, Turchin human evolution, cooperation and survival history